<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div dir="ltr"><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><br><br><div dir="ltr">sent from a phone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 16 Jun 2022, at 18:07, Hufkratzer <hufkratzer@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><p>I would say that clubs have a different approach than pitches. <br>
</p>
<p>We have <br>
</p>
<p>* 298 club=sailing but only 9 club=sports + sport=sailing</p>
<p>* 269 club=fishing but only 107 club=sports + sport=fishing</p>
<p>* 65 club=hunting but only 3 club=sports + sport=hunting</p></div></blockquote><br><div><br></div><div>I agree. Not saying that club=sports is generally bad, it could be the right tag for some clubs, but if a club is specialized the usual approach is flat hierarchies. A chess club and a hunting club, a yachting and a volleyball club are sufficiently different to merit their own top level club value. Not to speak about shooting (275).</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers Martin </div></div></body></html>