<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>what you propose as alternative tagging?<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>20 cze 2022, 15:51 od gdt@lexort.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div>My own contrarian take is that QR codes are not actually<br></div><div>'tourism=information'. They are a (not very good) pointer to<br></div><div>information which is *not actually present* at the node.<br></div><div><br></div><div>If we do map them, suggestions:<br></div><div><br></div><div> have some way to denote if the information in the code is actually<br></div><div> present in a human-readable way, like a printed URL. I view QR codes<br></div><div> without the content also printed to be deficient.<br></div><div><br></div><div> Don't use tourism=information, because a QR code sticker on something<br></div><div> is not generally useful, and tourism=information is expected to be.<br></div><div> Some other kind of tag I don't really object to. My point is that our<br></div><div> tagging is hierarchical and there are implied semantics for the group.<br></div><div> A bare QR code doesn't fit the information semantics in a real sense,<br></div><div> even though it does in some nonuseful technical sense.<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>