<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jul 23, 2022, 12:45 by 1998alexkane@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>I updated the proposal saying that using crossing_ref to describe pavement markings should be depricated.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">Is it really fundamentally needed?<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Note that as you bundle A, B, C, D in one proposals then someone opposing<br></div><div dir="auto">any of that will vote against.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">So bundling multiple changes increases opposition.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"> The biggest effect of this is that crossing_ref=zebra should be reverted to its original definition. <br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">Maybe it is useful, but can it be done separately?<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>Crossing_ref certainly needs an overhaul imo (maybe something like crossing:designation=GB:zebra or the like) but this would probably be best as a separate proposal.<br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">+1<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>