<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct</a><br></div><div dir="auto">already has following about changesets:<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div>You must also add the tag mechanical=yes (or bot=yes)<br></div><div><br></div><div dir="auto">Not sure why changing that would be beneficial or useful<br></div><div dir="auto">and you have not explained any reasons for doing this.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div>Aug 23, 2022, 12:17 by marc_marc@mailo.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Hello,<br></div><div><br></div><div>a work had been done a few years ago to make<br></div><div>an inventory of all changeset tags in use [1]<br></div><div><br></div><div>for mecanical/autoamted edit, There are at least two that deserve<br></div><div>a better consensus:<br></div><div><br></div><div>1) a tag that describe that's is a mecanical edit<br></div><div>I have see mecanical=yes reviwed=no type=mecanical<br></div><div>what's did you think ? I like the idea of type<br></div><div>but not the word type itself (due to its use for relation)<br></div><div><br></div><div>2) a tag that describe the scope of the edit<br></div><div>I was using scope=* and I also see is_in<br></div><div>is this tag better to describe the scope ?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Regards,<br></div><div>Marc<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>Tagging mailing list<br></div><div>Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br></div><div>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>