<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Aug 31, 2022, 19:37 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>I do not understand why some people oppose the move to deprecate "pipeline=marker".<br></div><div><br></div><div>To me, it suggests " this is a pipeline" and "the type of pipeline ( or purpose of the pipeline) is as a marker".<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">For me it is clearly pipeline marker.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">And "pipeline is a marker" seems to be a clear nonsense, so there is no risk of a<br></div><div dir="auto">confusion.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Of course you can define it to mean that it is a marker for a pipeline, but then you could define any group of words to mean anything you like. Would it not be better to define words to mean something that fits with their use in everyday language?<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">pipeline=marker meaning "pipeline marker" seems to not be really confusing<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">and definitely more clear from alternative where after several email, reading wiki,<br></div><div dir="auto">reading proposal I still have no idea how to mark pipeline marker in case where<br></div><div dir="auto">I am not sure about its contents.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If there is way to achieve this, please let me know (I see marker=pipeline on taginfo,<br></div><div dir="auto">but still see no point in migrating 32k+ of <br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/pipeline=marker">https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/pipeline=marker</a> to it)</div> </body>
</html>