<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Sep 5, 2022, 19:22 by frederik@remote.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>And I am not sure if "a wire strung along poles" would be sufficient to map a religious boundary or maybe just man_made=wire, support=poles ;) at least I'd like to know how someone can distinguish an "eruv boundary wire" from "just some wire someone strung up between poles".<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">Ask local people with knowledge specifically about this area.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Some name=* I mapped require the same.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>But leaving that aside for a moment, is there agreement that something physical needs to be there for a religious boundary to be mapped, or do people also accept the mapping of 100% "on paper" religious boundaries which can only be verified by cross-checking with third-party sources?<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">I am not happy about that, would prefer to not have that in OSM,<br></div><div dir="auto"> but I did nothing to delete them<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>