<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
On 2022-09-16 19:51, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:NC5LZXW--3-2@tutanota.com">
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="auto">What's the goal of differentiating concrete
vs concrete:plates anyway?<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div dir="auto">To detect/mark places where you will be very
likely hit with<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">"thump thump" when driving on them.<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Obnoxious especially to cyclist.<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">smoothness can sort of tag this, but it is kind of
special problem.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
This distinction does not work globally. In large parts of the world
regular concrete roads (continuously-poured steel-reinforced) have
the "thump thump" experience too due to transverse contraction
joints that are being cut into the concrete after curing.<br>
<br>
The wiki recommends to tag such new concrete roads as
smoothness=excellent, but with above-mentioned construction method
it seems preferable to map them as smoothness=good to account for
the significantly less smooth surface compared to new asphalt. <br>
</body>
</html>