<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>Oh, thanks for spotting!<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">This also works fine! And has some decent use already.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">(and incline=up;down is not the best idea as it<br></div><div dir="auto">- semantically applies rather when both apply at once across entire object<br></div><div dir="auto">- is often produced by buggy editors merging ways with incline=up<br></div><div dir="auto">and incline=down<br></div><div dir="auto">)<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Sep 26, 2022, 02:34 by timeo.gut@hotmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>There's also the tag incline=up/down which is already used around 400 times.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>On 2022-09-26 07:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>tagging incline direction on ways with mtb:scale:uphill is useful<br></div><div>as otherwise you need high-quality elevation model<br></div><div>to do routing, and in some cases it may be unavailable at all in sufficient detail<br></div><div>I wanted to systematically tag mtb scale info in some places to improve routing<br></div><div>for bicycle trekking.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Some people (like myself) are NOT interested at all in MTB routes but mtb:scale=1<br></div><div>(or just mtb:scale=0) is still fine for them.<br></div><div>So mtb:scale=1 mtb:scale:uphill=3 is fine downhill but not uphill for such people,<br></div><div>but it is hard to check in which way given path goes uphill<br></div><div><br></div><div>This is also recommended by wiki:<br></div><div><br></div><div>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:mtb:scale&uselang=en#mtb:scale:uphill=0-5 <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:mtb:scale&uselang=en#mtb:scale:uphill=0-5><br></div><div><br></div><div>So I wanted to systematically tag missing incline tags, as even without exact<br></div><div>value it is already valuable info for routing.<br></div><div><br></div><div>But what can be done in cases where there is no real incline but<br></div><div>path goes through series of up and down hops?<br></div><div><br></div><div>In many cases it is deliberately engineered (legally or not)<br></div><div>and looks often like https://www.moredirt.com/photo/91766<br></div><div>https://www.zip06.com/local-news/20220622/rockland-preserve-pump-track-is-officially-a-hit/ <br></div><div>https://www.bikehinton.com/hinton-bike-park<br></div><div>-------------<br></div><div><br></div><div>Would it be fine to tag incline=up_and_down in such case?<br></div><div>https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/incline=up_and_down<br></div><div>has some minimal use already.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Or maybe incline:variable=yes?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Splitting such way into incline=up / incline=down segments<br></div><div>is too much for me and I was splitting footway into 20m<br></div><div>segments to mark changing surface/lit status.<br></div><div><br></div><div>-------------<br></div><div><br></div><div>And why I want to tag some incline value? Because I want to do it<br></div><div>systematically for all such ways.<br></div><div>See https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/pull/4385<br></div><div>for the context (I want to also add it to StreetComplete if it will<br></div><div>be accepted there).<br></div><div><br></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>Tagging mailing list<br></div><div>Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br></div><div>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>Tagging mailing list<br></div><div>Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br></div><div>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>