<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Sep 27, 2022, 14:58 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>sent from a phone<br></div><blockquote><div>On 27 Sep 2022, at 14:52, Georg <georg2016@nurfuerspam.de> wrote:<br></div><div><br></div><div>IMHO yes.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I agree, although I wouldn’t see it necessary to characterize the feature <br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">I see value in mapping whether given amenity=drinking_water<br></div><div dir="auto">is a proper tap or just providing miserable jet of water making<br></div><div dir="auto">impossible to fill water bottle.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Also, I noticed that many bare amenity=drinking_water are in <br></div><div dir="auto">various ways quite likely to be problematic <br></div><div dir="auto">(misplaced, used for water taps without drinkable water or<br></div><div dir="auto">inaccessible to public and soon)<br></div> </body>
</html>