<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Sep 30, 2022, 10:56 by marc_marc@mailo.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Hello,<br></div><div><br></div><div>Le 30.09.22 à 04:20, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :<br></div><blockquote>maybe it should be changed and be treated as missing surface info<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don't see how cobblestone:flattened could mean unhewn_cobblestone in some case, imho it's a alias for sett<br></div><div><br></div><div>but if cobblestone:flattened (as said in the surface template)<br></div><div>should not be used to avoid confusion with sett or unhewn_cobblestone, why are you willing to ask if ti's asphalt etc like any missing<br></div><div>surface objet ?<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">1) it could be repaved in meantime and actual surface be now different<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">2) it would require extra effort to support this<br></div><div dir="auto">(about one day of work in total + increased maintenance effort)<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">3) it would be more confusing to user to have several different interfaces<br></div><div dir="auto">depending something unclear to user, especially given that it could in<br></div><div dir="auto">meantime changed to surface=asphalt (or badly tagged in the first place)<br></div> </body>
</html>