<div dir="ltr">The proposal currently states:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><p>Meaning of the <tt dir="ltr" class="gmail-mw-content-ltr" style="background:rgb(238,238,255);font-size:1em;line-height:1.6"><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unisex" title="Key:unisex">unisex</a>=yes</tt> is currently unclear:
</p>
<ul><li>gender neutral facility (as the "unisex" term in English); or</li><li>facility that accessible for men and women, either segregated or not.<br></li></ul></blockquote><div>I do not understand what is unclear. The term unisex is well understood among English speakers to mean "gender neutral". Unisex never refers to a gender segregated facility. A tag gender=unisex meaning "gender neutral" would be perfectly clear. gender=mixed would probably be understood, but "mixed gender" is not a commonly used phrase so it would probably have more potential for mis-interpretation. gender=neutral would probably be more widely understood, but again, I don't see the issue with gender=unisex.<br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 4:16 AM martianfreeloader <<a href="mailto:martianfreeloader@posteo.net">martianfreeloader@posteo.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">That's already in use in the same proposal.<br>
<br>
gender=any - all genders allowed, unknown if there is segregation<br>
gender=segregated - all genders allowed, genders segregated<br>
gender=unisex - all genders allowed, no gender segregation<br>
<br>
I was wondering if we can replace gender=unisex by something which has <br>
the same meaning. Currently, gender=mixed is used instead.<br>
<br>
<br>
On 06/10/2022 00:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:<br>
> gender=any?<br>
> <br>
> Thanks<br>
> <br>
> Graeme<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 at 21:21, martianfreeloader <br>
> <<a href="mailto:martianfreeloader@posteo.net" target="_blank">martianfreeloader@posteo.net</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:martianfreeloader@posteo.net" target="_blank">martianfreeloader@posteo.net</a>>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> In the discussion of the Gender proposal, I noted that I find it<br>
> strange<br>
> to use the term "unisex" for "gender-neutral" or "all-gender" (as sex<br>
> and gender are different properties).<br>
> <br>
> Proposal:<br>
> <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gender" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gender</a><br>
> <<a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gender" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gender</a>><br>
> <br>
> My suggestion was to use gender=mixed instead of gender=unisex.<br>
> However,<br>
> the question was raised whether the meaning of gender=mixed is still<br>
> easily understood if the feature can only be used by one person at the<br>
> time. I think the answer is yes. But if people disagree, it would be<br>
> great if they raise their concerns before voting starts.<br>
> <br>
> Any comments?<br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Tagging mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
> <<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Tagging mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote></div>