<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/10/22 18:37, Martin Koppenhoefer
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:FF3507C4-D2EC-473B-9133-FE7DA151A7C8@gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
          charset=UTF-8">
        <br>
        <br>
        <div dir="ltr">sent from a phone</div>
        <div dir="ltr"><br>
          <blockquote type="cite">On 9 Oct 2022, at 08:50, Warin
            <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com"><61sundowner@gmail.com></a> wrote:<br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div dir="ltr"><br>
            <span>I'll be voting no.</span><br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>me too, it is trying to deprecate a handful of tags I am
          using for fountain classification. Why do people have to
          “deprecate” other people’s tags when they introduce new ones
          with different semantics?</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>How can a “water outlet” tag replace a tag that represents
          the whole fountain?</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>I also don’t like unnecessarily convoluted tags of this
          kind:</div>
        <ul style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; list-style-image:
url("/w/skins/Vector/resources/common/images/bullet-icon.svg?d4515");
          margin: 0.3em 0px 0px 1.6em; padding: 0px; caret-color:
          rgb(32, 33, 34); color: rgb(32, 33, 34); font-family:
          sans-serif;">
          <li style="margin-bottom: 0.1em;"><tt dir="ltr"
              class="mw-content-ltr" style="font-family: monospace,
              monospace; font-size: 1em; direction: ltr;
              background-color: rgb(238, 238, 255); line-height: 1.6;"><bdi
                style="white-space: nowrap;"><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:water_supply:for&action=edit&redlink=1"
                  class="new" title="Key:water supply:for (page does not
                  exist)" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(165,
                  88, 88); background-image: none;"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">water_supply:for</a></bdi>=<bdi
                style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(165, 88, 88);
                background-image: none;"><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:water_supply:for%3Dbottles&action=edit&redlink=1"
                  class="new" title="Tag:water supply:for=bottles (page
                  does not exist)" style="text-decoration: none; color:
                  rgb(165, 88, 88); background-image: none;"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">bottles</a></bdi></tt></li>
        </ul>
        <div><font face="monospace, monospace" color="#202122"><span
              style="caret-color: rgb(32, 33, 34);
              -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;"><br>
            </span></font></div>
        <div><font face="monospace, monospace" color="#202122"><span
              style="caret-color: rgb(32, 33, 34);
              -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;">and usually a water
              outlet is not “for bottles” but compatible with filling
              bottles.</span></font></div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Some water outlets are designed for filling water bottles, just
      as some are designed for drinking from, showering...</p>
    <p>I wonder why showers are not yet a fountain= thing.. someone has
      not thought of it yet? <br>
    </p>
    <p>Other possible fountain values? trough? If it has water .. must
      be a fountain looks to be the mantra. <br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>