<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/10/22 20:55, Davidoskky via
Tagging wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:26487522-4084-24b9-a4f6-c7012dc3d4d9@yahoo.it">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p> </p>
<blockquote type="cite"><font face="times new roman, new york,
times, serif">If it was fitted with a shower .. then it
becomes a shower. </font></blockquote>
<font face="times new roman, new york, times, serif">If around the
pipe on which the tap is present is fitted a fountain .. then it
becomes a fountain.</font><br>
<p> </p>
<blockquote type="cite"> <font face="times new roman, new york,
times, serif">Nit picking: Oxygen is a gas .. under 'normal'
conditions. </font></blockquote>
<font face="times new roman, new york, times, serif">Better to use
the term fluid rather than liquid.</font>
<p><br>
</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote type="cite"><font face="times new roman, new york,
times, serif">I would expect the following to have taps are
part of their construction - as a OSM default - shower, bottle
filler, drinking fountain. If there is no tap .. then tap=no
.. or better flow=continuous. Why is flow=continuous better ..
it says what it is. </font></blockquote>
Why would tap=yes be a good default?
<p>I have run an overpass query to find all tagged types of
drinking fountains
("fountain"~"^(bubbler|drinking|nasone|drinking_fountain|toret|roman_wolf|wallace)$").</p>
<p>The total number of tagged items is 1572, 964 of which are in
Italy (732 of which in Rome!!). In Italy this kind of fountains
generally does not have a tap.</p>
<p>Thus, the majority of fountains currently tagged in osm do not
have a tap; at this point it would be more sensible to have
tap=no as a default.<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>In Australia it would be unusual to find a drinking fountain
without a tap to stop the flow when a person is not drinking. I
think it could be illegal such is the scarcity of water. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Certainly when water restriction are declared such uncontrolled
drinking fountains would be rendered useless, thus I don't think
there are any here without taps. <br>
</p>
<p>With the most restrictive water restrictions decorative fountains
are turned off, public water taps disabled but drinking fountains
still usable. <br>
</p>
</body>
</html>