<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Obviously, I support this. It has its own preset scheme in the iD
editor, its own icons etc.</p>
<p>The following are missing (of the top of my head, because I
proposed them) from the list and were approved already:</p>
<p><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcreamery">creamery</a></p>
<p><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dogham_stone">ogham
stone</a></p>
Anne<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/10/2022 14:15, martianfreeloader
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:8d808c13-61ae-6812-7a59-7de0e42ca56f@posteo.net">Hello.
<br>
<br>
I’m proposing to approve the historic=* key together with a number
of tags:
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Historic">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Historic</a>
<br>
<br>
historic=* is in widespread use and currently documented as de
facto.
<br>
<br>
Please comment wherever you feel most comfortable:
<br>
- Here
<br>
- On the wiki talk page
<br>
- In the forum
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
Tagging mailing list
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>