<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/10/2022 14:54, Anne-Karoline
Distel wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:fee03ab0-1778-2e19-ead8-d17372e595f6@web.de">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>Obviously, I support this. It has its own preset scheme in the
iD editor, its own icons etc.</p>
<p>The following are missing (of the top of my head, because I
proposed them) from the list and were approved already:</p>
<p><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcreamery">creamery</a></p>
<p><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dogham_stone">ogham
stone</a></p>
Anne</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I suspect that most editors' preset schemes aren't driven
entirely by what tags are "approved" and what aren't. iD has
historically used previous usage, so for example values suggested
for the key "building" match
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/building#values">https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/building#values</a> . JOSM
uses a different list of curated values, but defaults to what the
current mapper has used most recently.</p>
<p>For a new "historic" node, JOSM out of the box doesn't offer
"creamery" or "ogham_stone", and it wouldn't really make sense for
it to do so, since there are relatively few of either (even
unmapped) around the world compared to the other historical
suggestions already on JOSM's list.</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Andy</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>