<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Oct 12, 2022, 19:56 by me@evancarroll.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div>But in some places,<br></div><div>mappers have been more rigorous about respecting each building's<br></div><div>architectural origins.<br></div></blockquote><div><div><br></div><div>This is all 100% new to me. Where is it documented that a "shop" in a detached house should be mapped as a detached house, and not a shop? Where is the notion of "architectural origins" documented. <br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building</a><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><div><div dir="auto">I thought we could treat the wiki as authoritative and everything else not in the wiki as a wrong or mistaken, or unsupported?<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">definitely no, wiki is full of missing info, outdated info, runaway advocacy, <br></div><div dir="auto">confusion, misinformation and useful info<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">--signed, person with enormous amount of OSM Wiki activity<br></div> </body>
</html>