<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">I would say the lighting is slightly outdated.<br><br><div dir="ltr">Mvg Peter Elderson</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">Op 4 nov. 2022 om 17:06 heeft Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonewolf@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">I'll offer a well-known example from my country:<div><br></div><div><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Fabulous_Las_Vegas_sign">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Fabulous_Las_Vegas_sign</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>It's on the US National Register of Historic Places which should qualify it as a historic sign. Although I suppose those in Europe would just consider the sign to be a little old.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 11:56 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <<a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Post_Historic_District" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Post_Historic_District</a><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Nov 4, 2022, 16:38 by <a href="mailto:annekadistel@web.de" target="_blank">annekadistel@web.de</a>:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid rgb(147,163,184);padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px"><p>I wasn't aware bicycle parking and sign posts are considered
historic now. :P<br></p><div>On 04/11/2022 15:33, Mateusz Konieczny
via Tagging wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Nov 4, 2022, 12:59 by <a href="mailto:annekadistel@web.de" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">annekadistel@web.de</a>:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid rgb(147,163,184);padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px"><p>I also noticed that the <span><span style="font-family:monospace">inscription</span></span> key is used
a lot where it should be <span><span style="font-family:monospace">description</span></span>. I think
that's the "fault" of the iD editor form for historic
features. The <span><span style="font-family:monospace">inscription</span></span> field only
makes sense for memorials IMHO.<br></p></blockquote><div dir="auto">I used it for graves, crosses, monuments, <span>amenity = drinking_water, man_made = signpost,</span><br></div><ul><li><span>amenity = bicycle_parking</span><br></li><li><br></li><li><span>I see it also being validly used for </span>many
other objects.<br></li></ul><div dir="auto"><br></div><div><br></div><pre>_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
<br></pre></blockquote></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div> </div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Tagging mailing list</span><br><span>Tagging@openstreetmap.org</span><br><span>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>