<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>I think such limitations can be mapped sufficiently by using
"width", "maxwidth:physical" or "wheelchair" etc. For hazards like
dooring zones, there are already experiments with
"hazard[:bicycle]" or "danger", but more documentation or a
proposal on this might be useful.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 10.11.22 um 08:59 schrieb Robert
Skedgell:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:f910743b-5dc9-7864-bd29-1e80d6924fc7@hubris.org.uk">Thanks,
that should make mapping street parking in my local area much
easier and more consistent.
<br>
<br>
Where parking=on_kerb or parking=half_on_kerb are used alongside a
separately mapped sidewalk or cycle track, should there be a tag
on that way as well? It could be useful to routers concerned with
accessibility to know that it is potentially narrow, in the door
zone, may have charging cables as trip hazards, etc.
<br>
<br>
On 07/11/2022 11:37, Alex wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hey all,
<br>
<br>
over the past few weeks, a group of mappers has been working on
a proposal to improve the mapping of parking lanes and parking
spaces along streets. Considerations and discussions about this
have already arisen in the past among street parking mappers,
and now a proposal has been prepared.
<br>
<br>
The goal of this proposal is to deprecate and replace the
parking:lane=* and parking:condition=* schema for mapping street
parking spaces. The existing schema has some weaknesses and is
unnecessarily complicated and therefore unattractive for many
mappers. Above all, in many ways it differs from today's OSM
conventions. The proposed new schema is intended to be easier
and more logical to apply. The new schema follows established
OSM conventions more closely. It harmonises tagging of parking
spaces mapped on the centerline as an attribute of a street with
parking spaces mapped as a separate feature. It also reflects
aspects of a data migration process.
<br>
<br>
For details, see the proposal:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/street_parking_revision">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/street_parking_revision</a><br>
It is quite extensive, as it covers and reforms all aspects of
the previous schema and closes some further gaps.
<br>
<br>
Best regards
<br>
Alex
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
Tagging mailing list
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>