<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/11/22 23:25, Casper Kersten
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMf1zPE67ktV_A0-PA_pgiPqDNPrb2oc9NgRpgU1o1_qXm39hA@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">Site relations are usually completely redundant if
        you just tag an operator=* tag. A tourism=camp_site closed way
        or multipolygon is, of course, a camp site, and a shop or
        parking area on or belonging to that camp site should get an
        operator=* tag with the same tag value as the name or operator
        of the camp site. <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Local councils operate some campsites here, they also operate the
      library, community centre, town hall ... <br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMf1zPE67ktV_A0-PA_pgiPqDNPrb2oc9NgRpgU1o1_qXm39hA@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Grouping the tourism=camp_site area and all objects related
          to that camp site in a site relation and calling that a camp
          site as a whole is a clear violation of the One feature, one
          OSM element guideline, as the tourism=camp_site is already the
          element for the camp site and the site relation would
          unnecessarily duplicate that. <br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Some campsites registration area/desk/office is some distance
      from the campsite itself. <br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMf1zPE67ktV_A0-PA_pgiPqDNPrb2oc9NgRpgU1o1_qXm39hA@mail.gmail.com"><br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Op vr 11 nov. 2022 om 10:55
          schreef Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <<a
            href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>>:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Nov 10, 2022, 21:49 by <a
                href="mailto:lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de</a>:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote style="border-left:1px solid
              rgb(147,163,184);padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px">
              <div>Yves via Tagging <<a
                  href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                  class="moz-txt-link-freetext">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>>
                wrote:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote>
                <div>Site relations are often used to models thing that
                  aren't spatially<br>
                </div>
                <div>joined, like windfarms, universities... I can
                  easily imagine it's<br>
                </div>
                <div>reasonable to use them for campings in some corner
                  cases where a single<br>
                </div>
                <div>area doesn't work.<br>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Yes, let me clarify this with an example:<br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>E.g. This site has a working site relation (without
                tourism=camp_site removed):<br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div><a
href="https://opencampingmap.org/#15/49.0815/7.9123/1/1/bef/node/3824691120"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                  class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://opencampingmap.org/#15/49.0815/7.9123/1/1/bef/node/3824691120</a><br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>The camp_site node is <a
                  href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3824691120"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                  class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3824691120</a><br>
              </div>
              <div>Site relation is <a
                  href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13009876"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                  class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13009876</a><br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>While it is currently tagged toilets=yes and
                openfire=yes this is not<br>
              </div>
              <div>mandatory because evaluating the corresponding site
                relation will give us a<br>
              </div>
              <div>toilet and a fireplace.<br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>So what I do with site relations here is basically
                the same I do with<br>
              </div>
              <div>camp_site areas. With areas I check if any supported
                object is inside the<br>
              </div>
              <div>area (spatial join) and assume that this is a feature
                of this particular<br>
              </div>
              <div>camp_site.<br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>With site-relations this is even easier as I can
                consider all objects<br>
              </div>
              <div>related to the site a feature of the camp-site in the
                relation.<br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>I think this is elegant especially in comparison to
                the alternatives<br>
              </div>
              <div>suggested here like expanding the campsite polygon
                into areas open to the<br>
              </div>
              <div>general public like reception desks, restaurants or
                even toilets also used<br>
              </div>
              <div>by other facilities like sport-centers.<br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <div dir="auto">obviously camp site should not be fakely
              expanded to cover nearby <br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto">restaurants<br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto">what about automatically detecting nearby
              restaurants/toilets and so on?<br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto">rater than listing them manually with site
              relation (optionally, check <br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto">operator tag - that would apply only in
              cases where there are multiple<br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto">camp sites or other objects each with
              access=customers objects)<br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          Tagging mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
          <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
            class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>