<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/01/2023 22:42, Illia Marchenko
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAM2KGSNALaNPEY4OrWimcsXOa1xuK597jo7iO0yP=_RUv_+4MA@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="auto">
        <div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto">
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Graeme Fitzpatrick <<a
              href="mailto:graemefitz1@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true"
              class="moz-txt-link-freetext">graemefitz1@gmail.com</a>>:</div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div>A suggestion on the forum of amenity=training for
                  the first-air training side of things + a description
                  of everything else.</div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">Note that the proposal for  amenity </div>
        <div dir="auto">=training was rejected.<br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto"><a
            href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/training"
            moz-do-not-send="true">wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/training</a> </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>To be clear, what was rejected was the wiki page at
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/training">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/training</a>
      because it suggested deprecating a bunch of other tags.  There are
      still 3k <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=training">https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=training</a>
      in use, and it still may be the best fit for "training" if there
      is an outward-facing training facility that doesn't really fit
      anywhere else.</p>
    <p>"office=company" would surely work for the main office though.</p>
    <p>Best Regards,</p>
    <p>Andy</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>