<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 21/02/2023 14:34, Mateusz Konieczny
      via Tagging wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:NOoOJYP--3-9@tutanota.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Feb 21, 2023, 15:24 by <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:zeev.stadler@gmail.com">zeev.stadler@gmail.com</a>:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
        #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
        <div dir="ltr"><br>
          <div>
            <ol>
              <li>As far as non-emergency routing, the "locked" tag
                should be ignored.<br>
              </li>
              <li>A "locked=no" tag indicates that a legal access
                restriction is not enforced by a lock and therefore
                could be overcome in case of an emergency.<br>
              </li>
              <li>A "locked=yes" tag indicates that the legal access
                restriction is enforced by a lock and therefore cannot
                be overcome in case of an emergency.<br>
              </li>
            </ol>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <p>I'd actually suggest that "locked=yes" just means "there is a
      lock".  It _might_ be there to enforce a restriction, or it might
      be an "illegal lock".  There are unfortunately some examples of
      the latter on rights of way in England, Wales and especially
      Scotland.<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:NOoOJYP--3-9@tutanota.com">
      <blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
        #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>This is not the interpretation of other people, as
                seen in a discussion on a GraphHopper routing issue<br>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div>  <a
href="https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/2757#issuecomment-1434806229"
                    rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"
                    moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/2757#issuecomment-1434806229</a><br>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div>There you could also find a picture of such a
                  barrier.<br>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div>Please help us resolve the differences<br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div dir="auto">That is better mapped by mapping path around
        barrier, at least in my opinion.<br>
      </div>
      <div dir="auto"><br>
      </div>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Agreed - if you can walk around a locked gate, ensure that the
      OSM data reflects that.</p>
    <p>Best Regards,</p>
    <p>Andy</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>