<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>> "playground=ride / Is it supposed to include also coin
operated ones that make noise/lights/movements?"<br>
<br>
There is already "attraction=kiddie_ride" for them. This are
different types of devices, which are also usually not part of
playgrounds.<br>
<br>
<br>
> "playground=hammock / These are also placed independently
from playgrounds. Maybe have single tag for both?"<br>
<br>
Good idea – TagInfo knows 76x leisure=hammock, but I think we
should use this tagging only outside of playgrounds (since
hammocks on playgrounds are for a specific target group /
accordingly sized / not for public use in the stricter sense). I
added a reference to this tagging in the proposal: "For public
hammocks in general that are not part of playgrounds resp.
intended for this specific target group, there is leisure=hammock
in use."<br>
<br>
<br>
> "playground=artwork / playground=steps / why not use regular
step tagging?"<br>
<br>
If an object is part of the playground design and provides a
"play"/playground function, then it should also be identifiable
and evaluable via the playground namespace. Otherwise, for
example, the stairs of the path network on a playground could no
longer be distinguished from those that are part of a structure
(which makes data evaluations impossible for this devices/values).<br>
<br>
"artwork" is certainly an edge case here, but this value refers
primarily to (sometimes very small, discrete) decorative
playground elements, most of which I would not wish to spam the
tourism=artwork namespace. (The sample picture in the proposal is
a very "significant" one compared to what else is out there.)
Maybe they don't even fit the broader definition of
"tourism=artwork" because of it's limited public usability ("A tag
for public pieces of art; typically being staged in the physical
public domain, usually outside and accessible to all." – see also
hammock example)</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 27.05.23 um 10:25 schrieb Mateusz
Konieczny via Tagging:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:NWRJ6VH--3-9@tutanota.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">playground=ride
Is it supposed to include also coin operated ones that make noise/lights/movements?
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.google.pl/maps/@50.054966,19.8545417,3a,15.3y,207.67h,84.22t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sHED2kF0PByYJyi9CYVjXXw!2e0!5s20110801T000000!7i13312!8i6656?entry=ttu">https://www.google.pl/maps/@50.054966,19.8545417,3a,15.3y,207.67h,84.22t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sHED2kF0PByYJyi9CYVjXXw!2e0!5s20110801T000000!7i13312!8i6656?entry=ttu</a>
caught one
re: playground=hammock
These are also placed independently from playgrounds. Maybe have single tag for both?
re: playground=artwork
why not just normal artwork tagging?
"If it has a significant art relevance, consider also adding tourism=artwork. "
Note that vast majority of tourism=artwork has no art relevance and definitely no
significant art relevance
re: playground=steps
why not use regular step tagging?
(the same goes for some other tags)
May 27, 2023, 08:46 by <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:supaplex@riseup.net">supaplex@riseup.net</a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
Hi all,
anyone who maps playground equipment from time to time might be familiar with the issue: The playground values from the wiki represent only a small range of possible playground devices, for many others you have to get creative, come up with your own tags or dig through TagInfo to see how other mappers might have mapped a device.
As a group of mappers who regularly map playgrounds, we are proposing more values to the list of documented playground equipment to better map typical devices that had no documented value before.
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Extended_playground_equipment">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Extended_playground_equipment</a>
Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page.
Best,
Alex for the group of proposal authors
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>