<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Think of the situation with roads, and the multitude of different tags available to show how important the road is.<br><br>We only need two (or maybe three at most) to say whether a shared path is a good cycling path. And then a few guidelines so that non-cycling mappers can make an educated stab at getting it in the ball park.<br><br>By definition, a shared path will be suitable for pedestrians. There may be no value is judging how suitable. The situation for cyclists is different, because bikes are vehicles.<br><br>John<br><br>--- <b>John Smith <i><delta_foxtrot@yahoo.com></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><div class="plainMail">Rendering different paths based on the width is the only way to tag something verifiable and be able to render various paths
differently that I can think of.<br></div></blockquote></td></tr></table><br>