<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
John Smith wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:5016334a0912260402s1d05c13aj1744d0fe95477751@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">2009/12/26 Richard Colless <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:firefly@ar.com.au"><firefly@ar.com.au></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">What's people opinions on doing so ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
More information the better :)
Just because it exists in the database doesn't mean it always has to
be rendered, different renderings suit different people, which is why
the OpenCycleMap tiles exist.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I've been driving around some areas that are OSM mapped, but almost devoid
of features except the road. I find that having extra non-drivable features
makes the map more "comfortable" - gives you confidence in your location.
(I've been adding small creeks and dams around SW Sydney). Railway lines
would add the same detail, but precise accuracy wouldn't be needed, so they
could be added quickly, without detailed surveying.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
If you do this, just add a note/fixme that the information you add
isn't accurately surveyed, otherwise they may assume it has been.
How do I do this in Potlatch?
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>