<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>So those guys put out a legal statement and an employee even gave you his interpretation on this list, which you can cite in court if you want. I think you're pretty solid and it feels like people are just looking for problems no matter what is done or said. :-(<br><br><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.289062); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.222656); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.222656); ">Steve</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.285156); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.21875); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.21875);"><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.289062); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.222656); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.222656); "><a href="http://stevecoast.com">stevecoast.com</a></span></div></div><div><br>On Jun 16, 2011, at 0:44, Nick Hocking <<a href="mailto:nick.hocking@gmail.com">nick.hocking@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><p>My understanding is that Nearmap wish all contributions to OSM, by any mapper who has agreed to the CT, derived from their imagery (before the 17th June 2011) to be able to be relicenced by OSMF under any licence it (OSMF) chooses at any time.</p>
<div>However I also can't see exactly how the published statement meets this wish.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Nick</div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>legal-talk mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.org">legal-talk@openstreetmap.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>