<!--/*SC*/DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"/*EC*/-->
<html><head><title></title><style type="text/css"><!-- body{padding:1ex;margin:0;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:small}a[href]{color:-moz-hyperlinktext!important;text-decoration:-moz-anchor-decoration}blockquote{margin:0;border-left:2px solid #144fae;padding-left:1em}blockquote blockquote{border-color:#006312}blockquote blockquote blockquote{border-color:#540000} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: small;" dir="ltr"><div class="defangedMessage">
        <div id="me36282">
                <div>
                        Ok I've changed route=mtb to mtb=yes for the trail itself. That fixes the issue I had with the route side of this so that's great.</div>
                <div>
                         </div>
                <div>
                        Using this approach an mtb trail (singletrack) looks the same as a cycle path (paved commuter path). Is this correct?</div>
                <div>
                         </div>
                <div>
                        The area I'm looking at first is the Lynton Trails and Mitcham in Adelaide.</div>
                <div>
                         </div>
                <div>
                        David</div>
                <div>
                         </div>
                <div>
                         </div>
                <div>
                        ----- Original message -----</div>
                <div>
                        From: Steve Bennett <<a href="mailto:stevagewp@gmail.com">stevagewp@gmail.com</a>></div>
                <div>
                        To: <a href="mailto:dbclark@fastmail.com.au">dbclark@fastmail.com.au</a></div>
                <div>
                        Cc: "talk-au" <<a href="mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org">talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a>></div>
                <div>
                        Subject: Re: [talk-au] network and route tags</div>
                <div>
                        Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:36:31 +1100</div>
                <div>
                         </div>
                <div>
                        Hi David,</div>
                <div>
                          Where is this, btw? In general:</div>
                <div>
                         </div>
                <div>
                        - route=lcn are for bike paths that get you somewhere useful in the</div>
                <div>
                        local vicinity. (We still debate exactly what LCN means in Australia)</div>
                <div>
                        - route=mtb are for all mountain bike trails.</div>
                <div>
                         </div>
                <div>
                        Don't get hung up on any connotations you might have with a word like</div>
                <div>
                        "route", as a native English speaker. The benefit to using route=mtb</div>
                <div>
                        is that they show up specially highlighted on mountain biking map</div>
                <div>
                        styles, which is useful and appropriate.</div>
                <div>
                         </div>
                <div>
                        So, for each trail, I would:</div>
                <div>
                        - a route relation with route=mtb, and name=xx, and other tags as</div>
                <div>
                        appropriate</div>
                <div>
                        - tag the trail itself with highway=path, name=xx,</div>
                <div>
                        surface=dirt/gravel, and add the route relation</div>
                <div>
                         </div>
                <div>
                        Steve</div>
                <div>
                         </div>
                <div>
                        On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:33 PM, David Clark <<a href="mailto:dbclark@fastmail.com.au">dbclark@fastmail.com.au</a>></div>
                <div>
                        wrote:</div>
                <blockquote>
                        <div>
                                Hi All,</div>
                        <div>
                                 </div>
                        <div>
                                I am interested in a small area of trails. There are about 10 trails in a</div>
                        <div>
                                local reserve, all the trails are sign posted and named etc, but there is no</div>
                        <div>
                                actual marked route you just pick which trails you want to use to get to</div>
                        <div>
                                where you want to go.</div>
                        <div>
                                 </div>
                        <div>
                                However the tagging used in OSM to me seems wrong.</div>
                        <div>
                                 </div>
                        <div>
                                (1)</div>
                        <div>
                                network=lcn</div>
                        <div>
                                Is this correct to use?</div>
                        <div>
                                Should there be other tags associated with this such as network:name=xxxxx</div>
                        <div>
                                etc?</div>
                        <div>
                                 </div>
                        <div>
                                (2)</div>
                        <div>
                                route=mtb</div>
                        <div>
                                All the trails are tagged with route=mtb. However there is no marked or</div>
                        <div>
                                recognised physical route associate with these trails. Each trails is short</div>
                        <div>
                                approximately 200m to 500m long so it seems to me the route tag is not</div>
                        <div>
                                applicable.</div>
                        <div>
                                 </div>
                        <div>
                                Etiquette:</div>
                        <div>
                                 </div>
                        <div>
                                If the above tags are wrong, is it ok to just delete them? These tags have</div>
                        <div>
                                been used in this trail area and 2 others.</div>
                        <div>
                                 </div>
                        <div>
                                Thanks,</div>
                        <div>
                                David</div>
                        <div>
                                 </div>
                        <div>
                                <u>_______________________________________________</u></div>
                        <div>
                                Talk-au mailing list</div>
                        <div>
                                <a href="mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org">Talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a></div>
                        <div>
                                <a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au</a></div>
                        <div>
                                 </div>
                </blockquote>
        </div>
</div>
<div>
         </div>
</div></body></html>