<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">
<meta http-equiv="CONTENT-TYPE" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm">For those intrested? <br>
<br>
</p>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif"><span class="western">Progress.
A sample map - 360kb -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.maposmatic.org/results//107791_2014-01-11_23-56_Gal1.pdf">http://www.maposmatic.org/results//107791_2014-01-11_23-56_Gal1.pdf</a></span><br>
<br>
<span class="western">I think I've got most of the features up,
there are some duplicates - in different locations! The maps
are not
consistent so, for example, 'Pine Ridge' is plotted in two
places.
I'll look at that with text descriptions and the OSM
topographic
information to see if I can get a resolution of the problem.
And I need to check the bing view too. <br>
<br>
</span>I've asked for copyright permission from the Aust. War
Memorial, see how it goes. The main things I want to add now are
Turkish names and they look to be in their 'Gallipoli Mission'
book. <br>
<br>
NZ does not look to have an OSM talk group? The last set of data
I added came from an NZ book (1921 - copyright expired). </font>I'd
like to alert them to the mapping and the source. Comment - their
maps apear better than the OZie ones... <br>
<br>
<title></title>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="OpenOffice.org 3.4.1 (Win32)">
<style type="text/css">
<!--
@page { margin: 2cm }
P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm }
TT.cjk { font-family: "NSimSun", monospace }
-->
</style>On 3/01/2014 2:08 PM, Michael Collinson wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:ilk8wpedpngx09xc67e5mq9v.1388717086594@email.android.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
Hi Warin,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>First, wonderful idea, my grandad fought there with the 2nd
AIF and being able to relate dry names in books to actual places
is very satisfying ... whether just looking at the map or making
an actual visit.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I think it well worth approaching Australian War Memorial. As
OpenStreetMap can be used by commercial entities we cannot use
NC licensed data. But as we ourselves are non-commercial and you
are trying to do something for common good without reward, you
may well get a sympathetic response. In a similar vein, I was
able to get permission from the Smithsonian to add volcanos from
their global index. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I also agree that asking the Turkish community shows tact and
courtesy and will perpetuate the regard that the fighting men of
both sides had for each other. I suggest using name:en so that
Turkish names can be used as default.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best wishes for 2014 to all Australian mappers,</div>
<div>Mike</div>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-------- Original message --------<br>
From Warin <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com"><61sundowner@gmail.com></a> <br>
Date: 2014/01/02 21:29 (GMT-05:00) <br>
To <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org">talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a> <br>
Subject [talk-au] Mapping Gallipoli <br>
<br>
<br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
I've taken the trouble of mapping the present memorials (and their
associated roads, paths .. in some cases adjacent paths so people
don't take the wrong ones) at Gallipoli, Turkey. A few were maped
in the south (mainly British, about 4), one road was GPS sourced.
I've tried to get them all (OZ, NZ and Turkish mainly), there
maybe a few left (at least 2 I think) but I've not found them with
bing. <br>
<br>
The Question? <br>
Should I now map the named ridges, gullies etc that were used by
'us' (and/or named by 'us') in the action? I'd be using info from
the official Australian history (avalible as pdfs ... and that has
copyright exclusions under <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/au/">Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Australia (CC BY-NC 3.0
AU) license</a>. Oh ... rats ... no it doesn't - on another
page "The Australian War Memorial holds copyright for the text,
maps and photographs contained in the Official Histories.
Reproduction is allowed for private use only. For commercial
reproduction, the permission of the Memorial must be obtained." <br>
So that is 2 questions .. or 3 <br>
<br>
<br>
Should it be mapped? (I'm looking at chapter 24 page 546/7 if
your intrested. link <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/">http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/</a>
think you'd want volume 2) <br>
Would the turks object? I should ask them .. <br>
Getting permission from the Australian War Memorial? <br>
<br>
<br>
PS ..<br>
I'm now dowloading the 'Gallipoli Mission'.. I've had the WW1
history for some time .. and yes I've read it .. <br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/AWMOHWW1/Supplementary/GallipoliMission/">http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/AWMOHWW1/Supplementary/GallipoliMission/</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>