<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/04/15 23:14, Andrew Harvey wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAD5VjssqCk-KpfJLTxETRQqwWkJmKvm+Hh7L1G2_9VXDmtK9yA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On 15 April 2015 at 23:01, Ross <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:info@4x4falcon.com" target="_blank">info@4x4falcon.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
The issue is not with the licence. The current terms and
conditions require permission to add data not owned by the
contributor.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Is there a source for this statement?<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Go back to all the discussions in the 12 months prior to the licence
change. This was one of the major sticking points for a number of
contributors.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAD5VjssqCk-KpfJLTxETRQqwWkJmKvm+Hh7L1G2_9VXDmtK9yA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
I was under the assumption that in order to contribute
data (whether your own or someone else's) into OSM, the
data must comply with the contributor terms. Although the
CTs agree to always give attribution, this (probably)
still isn't compatible with the attribution required by
CC-BY and the "provide a link to the license and indicate
if changes were made" clauses of CC-BY. So my thinking is
for data to be added to OSM under the current CTs it needs
to waive these requirements of CC-BY and settle for
attribution only (and perhaps a specific form of
attribution).<br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
As you point out though this data is upto 8 years old and
in many cases there is probably better or more current
data available eg Tasmanian Estate Reserve.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
CAPAD is seems pretty good, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.environment.gov.au/fed/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B4448CACD-9DA8-43D1-A48F-48149FD5FCFD%7D">http://www.environment.gov.au/fed/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B4448CACD-9DA8-43D1-A48F-48149FD5FCFD%7D</a><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>