<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/04/15 23:14, Andrew Harvey wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAD5VjssqCk-KpfJLTxETRQqwWkJmKvm+Hh7L1G2_9VXDmtK9yA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">On 15 April 2015 at 23:01, Ross <span
              dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:info@4x4falcon.com" target="_blank">info@4x4falcon.com</a>></span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
              The issue is not with the licence.  The current terms and
              conditions require permission to add data not owned by the
              contributor.<br>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Is there a source for this statement?<br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Go back to all the discussions in the 12 months prior to the licence
    change.  This was one of the major sticking points for a number of
    contributors.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAD5VjssqCk-KpfJLTxETRQqwWkJmKvm+Hh7L1G2_9VXDmtK9yA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div><br>
              I was under the assumption that in order to contribute
              data (whether your own or someone else's) into OSM, the
              data must comply with the contributor terms. Although the
              CTs agree to always give attribution, this (probably)
              still isn't compatible with the attribution required by
              CC-BY and the "provide a link to the license and indicate
              if changes were made" clauses of CC-BY. So my thinking is
              for data to be added to OSM under the current CTs it needs
              to waive these requirements of CC-BY and settle for
              attribution only (and perhaps a specific form of
              attribution).<br>
            </div>
            <div> </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
              As you point out though this data is upto 8 years old and
              in many cases there is probably better or more current
              data available eg Tasmanian Estate Reserve.<br>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
              CAPAD is seems pretty good, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.environment.gov.au/fed/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B4448CACD-9DA8-43D1-A48F-48149FD5FCFD%7D">http://www.environment.gov.au/fed/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B4448CACD-9DA8-43D1-A48F-48149FD5FCFD%7D</a><br>
            </div>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>