<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 30/07/2015 10:20 AM,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:forster@ozonline.com.au">forster@ozonline.com.au</a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20150730102024.3vupi0doo0gs0c4w@webmail2.ozonline.com.au"
type="cite">Hi
<br>
<br>
What (if any) is the correct tagging for unauthorised trails in
national and state parks?
<br>
<br>
For example, Ant Track
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-37.92599/145.32051">https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-37.92599/145.32051</a>
<br>
<br>
I have spoken with Parks Vic and they request that bike riders do
not create additional trails and only use official trails. They
would prefer if such unofficial trails were not mapped or named
because it implies official status to park users.
<br>
<br>
I have not yet worked out how to contact the author of Ant Track.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
The trail physically exists? Then it is mappable.<br>
<br>
However .. tag it access=no (or similar) ... If the trail is blocked
off so people cannot use it tag disused. <br>
<br>
The track is <br>
<h2>Way: <bdi>Ant Track</bdi> (<bdi>289298073</bdi>)
</h2>
<div class="browse-section browse-way">
<h4> Added extra details to 'tracks' behind birdsland, and the new
access bridge to birdsland, from 3 seperate GPS tracks.
</h4>
<div class="details"> Edited <abbr title="Mon, 22 Sep 2014
11:20:40 AM UTC">10 months ago</abbr> by <a
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/steve91">steve91</a>
</div>
<div class="details"> Version #3 ยท Changeset #<a
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25600646">25600646</a><br>
<br>
<br>
So contact steve through OSM
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/login?referer=%2Fmessage%2Fnew%2Fsteve91">https://www.openstreetmap.org/login?referer=%2Fmessage%2Fnew%2Fsteve91</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>