<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/12/2015 21:58, Warin wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5671DE73.2090408@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/12/2015 8:35 AM, Ben Kelley
wrote:<br>
</div>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAE4-2TK14Qifiwb5KqrBvMLNwXxLJ4CwGjxh7sf9Nmnf-0vCqA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">Use is not consistent.</p>
</blockquote>
Situation normal. <br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAE4-2TK14Qifiwb5KqrBvMLNwXxLJ4CwGjxh7sf9Nmnf-0vCqA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr"> (If you harvest the natural trees, which one is
it?) </p>
</blockquote>
<br>
forestry. <br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAE4-2TK14Qifiwb5KqrBvMLNwXxLJ4CwGjxh7sf9Nmnf-0vCqA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">See the Forest page on the wiki, </p>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
The <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest</a> page describes 4
different approaches, and unfortunately because of the different
approaches someone consuming the data will struggle beyond "here be
trees" for any of them. As I understand it that's why the approach
of the OSM "Standard Style" is what it is (though there's no reason
for mappers to try and capture more detail though).<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Andy<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>