<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09-Oct-17 06:13 PM, Graeme
      Fitzpatrick wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXrXXh-mry-DoLFjN3BQYfONrzimk2bzEDJHdkN60zJSug@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">On 9 October 2017 at 16:04, Warin <span
              dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>></span>
            wrote:
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
              One problem is that 'locality' does not translate well.<br>
              I'd think that any admin area would have someone resident
              in the area.<br>
              So tagging them OSM 'locality' may not be the best?<br>
              <br>
              OSM says 'hamlet ' is less then 100-200 people. think that
              fits best?</blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>But what do we do when those "few" people are spread
              out over a largish area, with no central location?</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>The area of Lamington in SEQ <a
                href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-28.2351/152.9940"
                moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-28.2351/152.9940</a>,
              was, I thought, originally a locality, but is now shown as
              a hamlet.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Wiki <a
                href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamington,_Queensland"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamington,_Queensland</a>
              says that in 2011, it had a population of 463 people, but
              they're spread out over probably 200km2, if not more?</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>The "heart" of Lamington consists of 2 camping grounds,
              5k apart, one of which has a cafe / recreation centre
              (School camping type of arrangement) next door, <a
                href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-28.28710/153.03499"
                moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-28.28710/153.03499</a>,
              a handful of B&B's & farms & that's about
              it.  </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>To me, it should probably be a locality as there's
              nothing really there, a hamlet, IMHO, should feature a
              central clump of at least some homes / buildings, that you
              can point to & say "Yep, that's wherever" :-)</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Yep. <br>
    Tagging these area with 'place' may suit things where the population
    density is high -e.g. Europe - but does not sit well here. <br>
    These areas have no real centre. <br>
    Should one of these areas be tested by leaving out the place tag and
    see what happens? <br>
  </body>
</html>