<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-AU" link="blue" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">I didn’t know what to make of QLD, but I’ve just found this definition which suggests that the OSM coastline should be sufficient:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/viewMetadataDetails.page?uuid=%7B3F3DBD69-647B-4833-B0A5-CC43D5E70699%7D">http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/viewMetadataDetails.page?uuid=%7B3F3DBD69-647B-4833-B0A5-CC43D5E70699%7D</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“For coastal areas other than Brisbane, the LGA comprises the mainland and all islands above their respective sea-shores within the encompassed area.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="border:none;padding:0cm"><b>From: </b><a href="mailto:theswavu@gmail.com">Andrew Davidson</a><br>
<b>Sent: </b>Tuesday, 9 October 2018 20:56<br>
<b>To: </b><a href="mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org">talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [talk-au] PSMA Administrative Boundaries</p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 07/10/18 23:27, Lee Mason wrote:<br>
> Nice work on cleaning up the PSMA data, Andrew. It looks a lot easier to <br>
> manage for importing now.<br>
> <br>
> A quick look at the data, and it appears there is some regional/state <br>
> variance in the boundaries:<br>
> <br>
> Some of the WA LGAs extend out to the coastal waters limit.<br>
> <br>
> VIC LGAs mostly approximate the high tide mark (except around Port <br>
> Welshpool) and are shared with the locality boundaries.<br>
> <br>
> TAS LGAs mostly extend to the low tide mark and are not shared with <br>
> locality boundaries.<br>
> <br>
<br>
Weirdly in Queensland, some of the locality and LGA boundaries extend <br>
into international waters. They probably need to be cut-off at the <br>
coastal water boundary.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-au mailing list<br>
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org<br>
<a href="https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.openstreetmap.org%2Flistinfo%2Ftalk-au&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb4031c5544d440913b408d62dcd8908%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636746758117747213&sdata=YU6bIRXejeE5VCmeqRuCLA2uZp2veElbSkrviXQTYUE%3D&reserved=0">https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.openstreetmap.org%2Flistinfo%2Ftalk-au&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb4031c5544d440913b408d62dcd8908%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636746758117747213&sdata=YU6bIRXejeE5VCmeqRuCLA2uZp2veElbSkrviXQTYUE%3D&reserved=0</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>