<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/01/19 18:44, nwastra wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:37971150-3ECE-47CE-B0FF-E780758CA962@gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <br class="">
      <div>
        <div class="">
          <div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space;
            line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi<br class="">
            the gazetted State Forest boundaries are not rendered
            currently on the default map on the OpenStreetMap
            (OpenStreetMap Carto).<br class="">
            landuse=forest is considered as forestry use and
            natural=wood are natural wooded areas not subject to
            forestry but both are rendered the same.
            <div class=""><br class="">
            </div>
            <div class="">When the State Forest is mapped in isolation
              the boundary of the landuse=forest defines the area but as
              soon as an area of trees is mapped extending beyond the
              State Forest boundary, as is expected, then the State
              Forest boundary is not depicted.<br class="">
              <br class="">
              Tag:boundary=protected_area<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;">      </span><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=protected_area"
                class="" moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area</a>
              <div class=""><br class="">
                <div class="">After looking at the options listed on
                  wiki link above, along with the Nature-protected-areas
                  like national parks (and all the other <a
href="http://www.environment.gov.au/land/nrs/science/capad/abbreviations"
                    class="" moz-do-not-send="true">CAPAD types</a> ), I
                  feel that boundary=protected_area is reasonable tag
                  for the gazetted <b class="">State Forest boundaries</b>
                  with further classification as <b class="">Resources-protected-areas</b>.</div>
                <div class=""> </div>
                <div class="">I feel the the State Forests are
                  boundaries where tree resources are protected or
                  reserved for future forestry operations and need to be
                  defined by their boundaries on the osm.</div>
                <div class="">There are strict rules covering these
                  areas and we should be readily able to see them on the
                  map.  <br class="">
                  <div class="">State Reserve and Timber Reserve in
                    CAPAD don’t capture the State Forests.</div>
                  <div class=""><br class="">
                  </div>
                  <div class="">On the <a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=protected_area#Resources-protected-areas"
                      class="" moz-do-not-send="true">Resources-protected-areas</a> for
                    particular countries I note that the United States
                    has listed <b class="">State Forest</b> under
                    protect_class 15, this being described at the
                    Resources-protected-area section as …</div>
                  <div class="">15<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;">     </span><b
                      class="">location condition</b>: floodwater
                    retention area, protection forest, grazing land, … </div>
                  <div class=""><br class="">
                  </div>
                  <div class="">I propose that we also add ’State
                    Forest’ to protect_class 15 on the
                    Resources-protected-area table.</div>
                  <div class=""><br class="">
                  </div>
                  <div class="">With the most recent changes
                    toOpenStreetMap Carto this would enable rendering of
                    the State Forest boundaries in the same manner as
                    all the other protected area boundaries.</div>
                  <div class=""><br class="">
                  </div>
                  <div class="">Another partial solution would be to
                    render landuse=forest differently than the landcover
                    tags but that is unlikely from my reading of the
                    tagging and rendering groups and if two separately
                    gazetted forestry boundaries shared a border the
                    boundary between the two would not be depicted on
                    the map anyway. </div>
                  <div class=""><br class="">
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Personally I would remove any 'state forest' (or any other forestry)
    areas from any tagged natural=tree areas. There are at lest some
    that have been included in those tagged areas. <br>
    <br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>