<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 31/03/19 11:17, Sebastian S. wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:D6D94628-0E88-4784-90CA-66F77DAEA43C@consebt.de">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
What about 'rock art' ?<br>
-- <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Humm up in Kakadu they are tagged<br>
<br>
"tourism"="artwork"<br>
"historic"="archaeological_site"<br>
no site_type. <br>
<br>
I don't like the tourism tag for them so much, prefer the historic
as that better describes them? <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:D6D94628-0E88-4784-90CA-66F77DAEA43C@consebt.de"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 31 March 2019 11:13:07 am AEDT, Warin
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com"><61sundowner@gmail.com></a> wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
<p><tt>Hi,</tt></p>
<p><tt><br>
</tt></p>
<p><tt>Aboriginal rock engravings are tagged;<br>
</tt></p>
<p><tt><tt>"historic"="archaeological_site"</tt></tt></p>
<p><tt>site_type"="petroglyph"</tt></p>
<p><tt><br>
</tt></p>
<p><tt>What should </tt><tt><tt>Aboriginal painted sites be
tagged? </tt><br>
</tt></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><tt><tt>"historic"="archaeological_site"</tt></tt></p>
<p><tt>site_type"= ??? <br>
</tt></p>
<p><tt> </tt></p>
<p><tt><br>
</tt></p>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="6"><br>
</font></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>