<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">I map them with access private because I can see them on aerial images and on the ground. If the path is e.g. behind a high hedge I will limit to the visible part or what I can see on aerial images.<br>I think mapping these roads adds value for everyone who is trying to get to the particular address. <br>Thinking of a delivery vehicle I am even considering if access=permissive would be appropriate.<br><br>In the end it is not the map that is trespassing but the individual on location that is.<br>-- <br>Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 5 October 2019 9:44:47 am AEST, Warin <61sundowner@gmail.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre>Hi,</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>I am in 2 minds about this ... these roads exist so they can be seen.
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>They might be usefull navigational features;</pre>
<pre>firstly to plot progress along a public road - you have just past this private road so you must he here on the map.</pre>
<pre>secondly for any emergency services - mainly thinking of fire, particularly of non local fireies.
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>Some object as mapping them may encourage inappropriate use.. "its on my map, so I can use it" is one of the responses. Sigh.
</pre>
<pre>Adding access=private works for some renders and not others.
</pre>
<pre>-------------------------</pre>
<pre>I do like to see the map with all these tracks, even private ones.
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>On the other hand I don't want people seeing a line on the map and thinking they can use it...
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>===================</pre>
<pre>A middle ground? Show the start of the track and no more???
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>--------------------------- From the Aust. Tagging Guidelines</pre>
<pre><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Road_Tagging">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Road_Tagging</a>
</pre>
<style type="text/css">p { margin-bottom: 0.25cm; line-height: 120%; }a:link { }tt.cjk { font-family: "Courier New",monospace; }</style>
<pre>
How I would tag farm tracks..
<span class="western">"highway=track Gravel fire trails, forest drives, 4WD trails and similar roads. "</span></pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre><span class="western">Then goes on to </span>
</pre>
<pre><span class="western">"highway=service</span> Unnamed access roads. e.g.
Entrance ways and roads in parks, government properties, beach access
etc. Use a short service road where you may want to mark the entrance
to a private/government area, but not map the interior private roads
in detail."</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>The problem here is that some raise the "not map the interior
private roads in detail" as not mapping them at all.
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>
</pre>
</blockquote></div></body></html>