<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/10/2019 09:33, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:LqeV6S3--3-1@tutanota.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">7 Oct 2019, 23:02 by
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org">talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a>:</div>
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
<div>"Community paths" (official term) are the most common path
type in the ACT and correspond in the OSM ATG to the tagging:<br>
</div>
<div>- highway=path<br>
</div>
<div>- foot=designated<br>
</div>
<div>- bicycle=designated<br>
</div>
<div>- segregated=no<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">Are you sure that ways signed
as designated<br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">for cyclists and pedestrians
are far more<br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">popular than all other ways?</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>The way that this question is phrased suggests that the user is
either simply trolling, or struggles with the concept of
"discussion" and treats this list as essentially write-only. This
wouldn't be unique in OSM; we've had people treat diaries and the
wiki in a similar way before.<br>
</p>
<p>Until the author shows that they're willing to engage with other
people (replying to other people's posts, answering questions,
explaining how they've contributed to OSM) it's unlikely that
anything of value will come from these posts. The talk-au list is
one of the sanest OSM lists around; relatively speaking it has
fewer people grandstanding and more people collaborating to get
things done than almost any other OSM forum that I'm subscribed
to. <br>
</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Andy</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>