<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><title></title><style type="text/css">p.MsoNormal,p.MsoNoSpacing{margin:0}</style></head><body><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">I would like to confirm that the inclusion of qualifiers such as "closed" or "freight only" in the name is NOT appropriate.<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">e.g. <br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">railway=station<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">name = xxxxxx (closed)<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"> or <br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">railway=station<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">name=xxxxxxx (freight only)<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">I understand both are inappropriate uses of the name tag and should not be used.<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">I think the first should be tagged as disused or abandoned such as<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">disused:railway=station<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">name=xxxxxxxx<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">and the second with<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">railway=yard<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">name=xxxxxxx<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">Is that generally agreed? <br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;">What about a former railway station that is now freight only. Can one combine disused:railway=station and railway=yard on the one node or should there be multiple nodes?<br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div>On Sat, 19 Oct 2019, at 6:53 AM, Ewen Hill wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" id="qt"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div><div><div style="font-family:Arial;">Hi,<br></div><div> I am trying to get some clarity about tagging old railway stations like <a href="https://i1.wp.com/judithsalecich.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/The-former-Bogantungan-Railway-Station.jpg?ssl=1">https://i1.wp.com/judithsalecich.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/The-former-Bogantungan-Railway-Station.jpg?ssl=1</a> that has not seen a train stop for a numbe of decades<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>There appears to be a myriads of ways to tag this according to the Wiki. What is the best standardised approach (which I will add to the ATG)<br></div></div><div class="qt-gmail_signature" dir="ltr"><br></div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>Talk-au mailing list<br></div><div>Talk-au@openstreetmap.org<br></div><div>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au<br></div><div><br></div></blockquote><div style="font-family:Arial;"><br></div></body></html>