<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/10/19 20:44, Ewen Hill wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAF=SO88rJ0-chLrb=fjLJfZm9CZrOq4NRxScmgK6eb53poxgJA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">Thanks Warin,
<div> I have been using a node or polygon for the railway
station as follows however it is raising a level 2 error in
osmose...</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>name=xxx</div>
<div>historic:railway = station (or station_site)</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I think osmose may be complaining that it is not an area?<br>
If an area, then it may just be that historic:railway is not
documented on the wiki.... so osmose objects.<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAF=SO88rJ0-chLrb=fjLJfZm9CZrOq4NRxScmgK6eb53poxgJA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If the building can be traced, I would also add a polygon</div>
<div>building=train_station<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>There appears to be a lot of confusion (see <a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations#Stations_and_sites_which_are_not_currently_in_operation"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations#Stations_and_sites_which_are_not_currently_in_operation</a> )
over </div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>historic:railway=station</li>
<li>railway:historic=station</li>
<li>disused=yes</li>
<li>not tagging it at all with any railway tags</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
disused=yes is not good, it should be disused:*=*<br>
<br>
<br>
I would be against railway:historic... for historic:railway. <br>
<br>
The confusion is because people try to map different things: <br>
some try to map things that are no longer there - don't map, use
OHM!<br>
some try to map things that are disused - disused:*=*<br>
some try to map things that are re-purposed<br>
<br>
The answers are many, and even where the item is the same thing the
answers change from mapper to mapper and with time. <br>
Example: disused=yes used to be the tagging method, now it is
disused:*=*... <br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAF=SO88rJ0-chLrb=fjLJfZm9CZrOq4NRxScmgK6eb53poxgJA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>I want to keep the information from appearing in current
travel options but available to explain how the township
formed around a particular location</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Personally I don't usually use historic as I am not usually certain
of the historic worth of the thing. So usually disused: abandoned:
etc for me. <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAF=SO88rJ0-chLrb=fjLJfZm9CZrOq4NRxScmgK6eb53poxgJA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Ewen</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 19:33,
Warin <<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On
19/10/19 17:53, Ewen Hill wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi,<br>
> I am trying to get some clarity about tagging old
railway stations <br>
> like <br>
> <a
href="https://i1.wp.com/judithsalecich.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/The-former-Bogantungan-Railway-Station.jpg?ssl=1"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://i1.wp.com/judithsalecich.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/The-former-Bogantungan-Railway-Station.jpg?ssl=1</a> that
<br>
> has not seen a train stop for a numbe of decades<br>
><br>
><br>
> There appears to be a myriads of ways to tag this
according to the <br>
> Wiki. What is the best standardised approach (which I
will add to the ATG)<br>
<br>
<br>
The building is still a building...map as a way with <br>
building=train_station as it is recognisable as a train
station?<br>
<br>
It does appear to be now a museum... I'd map that as a
separate node <br>
with the relevant details.<br>
<br>
<br>
It was a train station or halt.. Could be be one again? This
should be <br>
an area that includes the building and local track.<br>
<br>
disused:railway=halt/station or
disused:public_transport=station<br>
<br>
or abandoned:*=*<br>
<br>
If no longer in existence then consider mapping it in OHM.<br>
<br>
Nothing Oz specific about it?<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-au mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">Warm Regards<br>
<br>
Ewen Hill<br>
Internet Development Australia<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>