<div dir="ltr">Generally yes. <div><br></div><div>There are a few different treatments. The two main ones are where the straight through cycle traffic remains to the left of a separated barrier.<div><br></div><div>Best example I can think of is at Ian Parade near concord.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/PR6ShOVEl-hNO91xjsDwLQ">https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/PR6ShOVEl-hNO91xjsDwLQ</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>And there is also the fully separated off-ramp on-ramp style treatment. There are also a few of those around Concord. And also going through the large roundabouts at North Nowra. And other places.</div></div><div><br></div><div>As for cycle-lanes actually going through roundabouts. Well, the classic example would be on Darling Drive. There used to be two where the cycle-lanes went straight through, and there is one remaining. It's a terrible piece of infrastructure though. There are some others around the place. If they don't cross exists they can be okay - but the ones crossing exits are dangerous.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://goo.gl/maps/r3LG7XajfvbEBRBQA">https://goo.gl/maps/r3LG7XajfvbEBRBQA</a></div><div><br></div><div>As much as we'd all like to have OSM to be our representation of how cycle-friendly a road is, OSM in Sydney is already suffering a fair bit from people entering their own interpretation of what is cycle infrastructure. So, I really think the best thing is to map it as it is. But appreciate the motivation to try and let others know about the continuity of a cycle route. </div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Ian.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 19:42, Warin <<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div>On 31/12/19 16:42, Ian Sergeant wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="auto">IMO clearly no.
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">A router may even prefer to route around
roundabouts and prefer a route where cycling amenity is
actually continuous. Map it how it is, and the router can
decide based on the preferences (weightings) of the rider.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Ian.</div>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, 8:05
am Sebastian S., <<a href="mailto:mapping@consebt.de" target="_blank">mapping@consebt.de</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>I agree that if there is nothing marked, however my
question was rather from a continuity point of view.<br>
The roads into and out of the round about have cycle
lanes. The cyclist needs to merge with the road traffic
to pass through.<br>
Should the roundabout have cycle=designated or yes to
ensure routing goes through it?<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 30 December 2019 6:56:31 am
AEDT, Andrew Harvey <<a href="mailto:andrew.harvey4@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">andrew.harvey4@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto">
<div>If there's nothing marked on the road in the
roundabout, then you can just omit the cycle
lane tag from the roundabout. <br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun., 29
Dec. 2019, 2:21 pm Graeme Fitzpatrick, <<a href="mailto:graemefitz1@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">graemefitz1@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Thanks
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Graeme</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On
Sat, 28 Dec 2019 at 16:52, David Wales
<<a href="mailto:daviewales@disroot.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">daviewales@disroot.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>I prefer to use separate ways for
separate foot paths.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As do I.</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 28
December 2019 3:02:30 pm AEDT,
Sebastian Spiess <<a href="mailto:mapping@consebt.de" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">mapping@consebt.de</a>>
wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I do welcome comments. In
particular regarding how to go
about the cycle way and the
roundabout. </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Looks OK to me, but I've also
wondered how bike lanes are supposed
to work through roundabouts, when
there's nothing marked on the road?</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
For safety I think you will find all bicycle lanes end before any
roundabout and restart after the roundabout.. helps stop cars
exiting over cyclists, well it is supposed to...<br>
<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-au mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au</a><br>
</blockquote></div>