<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>17 Jan 2020, 11:42 by andrew.harvey4@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><div>I'm all for using the lifecycle prefix, <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix</a>. I agreed that if there's still remains there use ruined or destroyed, not sure what the difference is though.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>ruined implies that ruins still remain, destroyed may mean that or that there is no trace at all<br></div><div><br></div><div>in practice difference is minor if any<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><div> Once it's been cleared you could use demolished, removed or raised<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>Probably razed, not raised. I see not real difference.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><div>, again not sure what the difference is. While damaged is not documented it seems the perfect fit since there is no other suitable tag for this on the wiki.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>damaged seems to me a poor fit as prefix, damaged building is still a building,<br></div><div>and I would expect building=something tag to be used.<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>