<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/1/21 9:30 am, Kim Oldfield wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:186e09d3-1f25-edab-173f-505bd6e58b45@oldfield.wattle.id.au">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
OSM compatible alternatives to Google Street View include <a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapillary"
moz-do-not-send="true">Mapillary</a> and <a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/KartaView"
moz-do-not-send="true">KartaView/OpenStreetView/OpenStreetCam</a>.<br>
<br>
On 7/1/21 3:34 am, Mat Attlee wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CADnaBBT_7Tkzxn87Vo3z9uPk46bH097C0fZR+a--CHLMCmJZvg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>I've been reviewing the maps in Sydney and have noticed
that quite a few roads have a surface of paved yet are
actually asphalt when compared against Google Street View<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>As Kim implies, Google street view (or other Google products)
cannot be used in OSM. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>---------------------</p>
<p>Removing 'paved' and not replacing it decreases the data, so that
is not a good idea. <br>
</p>
<p>If you want to add more detail then replace paved with the more
precise value. The DCS NSW Imagery has the best resolution that
may help determine which kind of paving has been used, of course a
personal survey is best. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>