<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/2/21 10:45 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXr1vgu31S+mgwdza7jTP64ENVj0NK63--E_DTtXSb+tiA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br clear="all">
<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 20:11,
Warin <<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div><br>
<div>I have deleted the tags of barrier=fence andÂ
"note"="was outer for Sydnye Harbour National Park
before LPI Admin Boundary data used."<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks, I wondered whether the National Park / LPI tag
should stay for historical purposes?</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>The relation for HMAS Watson had 4 members.. all but one of these
has been removed. <br>
</p>
<p>That one, I think, was for some of the northern and or western
boundaries where they should coincide with the National Park
boundaries and had a fence. <br>
</p>
<p>The others covered different locations. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>The history can be recovered using the history button on the
relevant feature. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXr1vgu31S+mgwdza7jTP64ENVj0NK63--E_DTtXSb+tiA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div> <br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>I doubt very much that HMAS Watson allows general
public access. <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I thought I had set it as access=private? <br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Which I've interpreted as "No, you can only come in if we
say so" (eg military personnel (& families?) posted to
that Base, civilian staff & contractors, anybody else
that they want to let in, but no-one else).</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>The claim was that the public had access along the cliff line ..
and that is not true through HMAS Watson. <br>
</p>
<p>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</p>
<p>At the moment the boundary is drawn such that;</p>
<p>it leaves gaps between the National Park and HMAS Watson... <br>
</p>
<p>HMAS Watson boundary overlaps the National Park...</p>
<p>there is a gap between the cliff top and HMAS Watson .. where no
barrier or other indication that the boundary for HMAS Watson
stops there at all. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Looking at the park boundary to the south east of HMAS Watson it
can be seen that the boundary there does not follow any feature at
all! As this was originally part of the defense property possibly
the HMAS Watson follows a similar irregular boundary on its
seaward side. I was thinking of ringing the local council to see
if they knew, but given the irregular nature of the park boundary
I can see little point to it. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I take it you have finished with your tag changes? If so I'll try
to alter the boundary so it uses the park boundary and cliff line
as separate ways in the relation. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>