<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/2/21 10:53 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXpSBNgkZBuZjXKhLJecfK9ofetwuoLN+yjvvBHMnCCdWQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br clear="all">
<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 19:23,
Warin <<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Looking at the park boundary to the south east of HMAS
Watson it can be seen that the boundary there does not
follow any feature at all! As this was originally part
of the defense property possibly the HMAS Watson follows
a similar irregular boundary on its seaward side.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I would also say that at one time, the boundary of the
military area extended further than it does now. There are
two buildings there: <i>The Armoury</i> & <i>The
Officers Mess</i> which would obviously have been
included, but are now on public land, although still part of
the National Park.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>It also extended northwards to the gun emplacements that are now
in the park. The area has shrunk .. it could go further but then
various things would have to be moved ... $$$$$$$ ... There is a
very small bit that would have to remain at least at some coastal
location close to the heads. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXpSBNgkZBuZjXKhLJecfK9ofetwuoLN+yjvvBHMnCCdWQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p> I was thinking of ringing the local council to see if
they knew, but given the irregular nature of the park
boundary I can see little point to it. <br>
</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>I had a go at using the DCS Base & Topo maps, &
was able to tweak part of the boundary a little bit, but
they don't really show anything different to what we had.<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I take it you have finished with your tag changes? If
so I'll try to alter the boundary so it uses the park
boundary and cliff line as separate ways in the
relation. <br>
</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Yeah, pretty well. Tidied up a few roads & buildings
but that's about it. If you look along the eastern boundary
on top of the cliffs, you can see the line of the fence /
wall, which I have followed, so it would appear that, while
close, the boundary doesn't actually go to the edge of the
cliff.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I did not see any fence there but then I was more interested in
the cliff. Unfortunately the DCS is giving me 'no tiles' messages
at the moment so I will have to leave it there for the moment. <br>
</p>
<br>
</body>
</html>