<div dir="ltr">I'd say it's okay when you have multiple traces as you've mentioned.<div><br></div><div>Not aware of any automated process which exists to do it.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 16:27, Bob Cameron <<a href="mailto:bob3bob3@skymesh.com.au">bob3bob3@skymesh.com.au</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Just checking if this is an okay thing to do. ie moving a major road so <br>
it is centred on GPS traces - assuming there enough data for accuracy <br>
(eg bidirectional, multi trace etc)<br>
<br>
The traces are probably more accurate than overhead imagery.<br>
<br>
Other features placed relative to roads will also need moving?<br>
<br>
Reason I ask is a concern that there may be an automated process that <br>
adjusts existing roads.<br>
<br>
Tnx<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-au mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au</a><br>
</blockquote></div>