<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">This also depends on local topography.
<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Around Jenolan Caves the GPS does not
have much sky view and can be all over the place, the satellite
view is better. <br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 14/5/21 4:43 pm, Andrew Harvey
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAD5VjsvZ=CvO4oVOr-SKdTmq-bbqkrLe2OESVE7pXd7c=oFnKQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">I'd say it's okay when you have multiple traces as
you've mentioned.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Not aware of any automated process which exists to do it.</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 16:27,
Bob Cameron <<a href="mailto:bob3bob3@skymesh.com.au"
moz-do-not-send="true">bob3bob3@skymesh.com.au</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Just
checking if this is an okay thing to do. ie moving a major
road so <br>
it is centred on GPS traces - assuming there enough data for
accuracy <br>
(eg bidirectional, multi trace etc)<br>
<br>
The traces are probably more accurate than overhead imagery.<br>
<br>
Other features placed relative to roads will also need moving?<br>
<br>
Reason I ask is a concern that there may be an automated
process that <br>
adjusts existing roads.<br>
<br>
Tnx<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>