<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 23/7/21 3:35 pm, Mateusz Konieczny
via Talk-au wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:MfGrEpY--3-2@tutanota.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Jul 23, 2021, 06:11 by <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
<div class="">On 23/7/21 12:00 pm, cleary wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="" wrap="">In regard to mapping gates, I have tagged barrier=gate.
Where roads have public access on both sides of a gate, I presumed that access through the gate was apparent. In hindsight, perhaps it was remiss of me to presume that the absence of an access tag would be interpreted as access=yes. I don't think I have added access=yes unless I thought there was any doubt. I have added locked=yes where public roads become private but I don't think I have ever added locked=no.
In future, I will add access=* and locked=* to any gates.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre>
</pre>
<pre>I too would assume access=yes and locked=no on gates without added tags.
Though, being lazy or probably just not thinking about it, I usually tag the roads with access=private and be done rather than add it to the gate as well.
I don't know if renders would pay any attention to these tags either? The road access tag is displayed on some renders.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<div dir="auto">Not aware about renderers but routers are likely
to tag access tagging on gates<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">into consideration<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre>Much more likely to consider it on the road.
</pre>
</body>
</html>