<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-AU link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>The correct offset for imagery can change very quickly from one place to another (alignment could be right at one place and off 100m down the road if the imagery is distorted).<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>JOSM has an “imagery offset database” if you install the right plugin:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><a href="https://learnosm.org/en/josm/correcting-imagery-offset/">https://learnosm.org/en/josm/correcting-imagery-offset/</a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>you can use that to upload your corrected offset for a specific place and imagery layer so that others can get that offset from the db.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>But this requires that people are conscious of the need to check the imagery offset before they do any work, and I think it’s only used by JOSM, not iD and other editors.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US> Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1@gmail.com> <br><b>Sent:</b> Sunday, 3 October 2021 12:20<br><b>To:</b> Andrew Davidson <theswavu@gmail.com><br><b>Cc:</b> osm.talk-au@thorsten.engler.id.au; OSM Australian Talk List <talk-au@openstreetmap.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [talk-au] Way errors in Quilpie Qld<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Is there any way for all of the various sets of imagery to be automatically corrected to each other to get around this problem?<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Graeme<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 at 12:02, Andrew Davidson <<a href="mailto:theswavu@gmail.com">theswavu@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><p class=MsoNormal>On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 10:46 PM Thorsten Engler via Talk-au<br><<a href="mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br>> I would assume that the lot boundaries recorded in DCDB are "exact" and any<br>> discrepancy between them and the physical world come down to the margin of<br>> errors the surveyors did when placing boundary pegs at some point.<br><br>I tried to check against any survey marks that you might be able to<br>locate on the imagery. Unfortunately there are no survey marks in<br>Quilpie from the GNSS era of surveying. I did manage to find one near<br>town that you can just make out where it would be on Bing:<br><br><a href="https://qspatial.information.qld.gov.au/SurveyReport/SCR183342.pdf" target="_blank">https://qspatial.information.qld.gov.au/SurveyReport/SCR183342.pdf</a><br><br>> Bing is almost right: -0.15; 1.79<br><br>I get -0.10;1.50 which, considering that we are looking at aerial<br>imagery with a pixel size of ~0.15m, is the same thing. This is all<br>based on GDA94, so in theory all of the GPX traces will be offset by<br>about 1.63 m<br><br>I have done a best-fit and moved the town about 11 m to the west.<br>There are some things (e.g. the rail line near the sale yards) that<br>need to be better traced. I will have a look at these later.<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Talk-au mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a><br><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></body></html>