<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.DefaultFontHxMailStyle
{mso-style-name:"Default Font HxMail Style";
font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-AU link=blue vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span class=DefaultFontHxMailStyle>Hi,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span class=DefaultFontHxMailStyle><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span class=DefaultFontHxMailStyle>For shared paths, agree with Andrew that the tags should be bicycle=designated + foot=designated + segregated=no. There’s a legacy tag issue in Victoria where many shared paths are still tagged as highway=cycleway only, which is slowly being fixed.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span class=DefaultFontHxMailStyle><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span class=DefaultFontHxMailStyle>Philip<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span class=DefaultFontHxMailStyle><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal style='border:none;padding:0cm'><b>From: </b><a href="mailto:andrew.harvey4@gmail.com">Andrew Harvey</a><br><b>Sent: </b>Monday, 4 October 2021 8:49 PM<br><b>To: </b><a href="mailto:s.azagra@me.com">Sebastian Azagra Flores</a><br><b>Cc: </b><a href="mailto:philip@philipmallis.com">Philip Mallis</a>; <a href="mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org">OSM Australian Talk List</a><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [talk-au] Cycling on Victorian paths</p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span class=DefaultFontHxMailStyle><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 18:18, Sebastian Azagra Flores via Talk-au <<a href="mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org">talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:</p></div><div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The question is when is a foothpath with bicycles=yes considered a shared path?</p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Should a shared paths be used over footpath=yes ?</p></div></div></blockquote><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>From my NSW perspective, shared paths are always tagged as bicycle=designated + foot=designated + segregated=no. Most are highway=cycleway but this is more just by convention, and a bit of bias from cyclists, highway=footway or highway=path are equally okay in my opinion.</p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal>Never heard of footpath=yes before, it's undocumented and has practically no use <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:footpath">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:footpath</a>. What do you use footpath=yes to mean?</p><p class=MsoNormal><span class=DefaultFontHxMailStyle><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div></body></html>