<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 09:07, Andy Townsend <<a href="mailto:ajt1047@gmail.com">ajt1047@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div><p>What actually is it that you're referring to when you say
      "routing" above?</p></div></blockquote><div>Testing routing via OSRM after putting a path along the beach still gives:</div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=-28.1073%2C153.4665%3B-28.1155%2C153.4709#map=16/-28.1116/153.4681">https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=-28.1073%2C153.4665%3B-28.1155%2C153.4709#map=16/-28.1116/153.4681</a> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>
    <p>they also update at different times (which might even be
      months after the data in OSM has updated).</p></div></blockquote><div>Wasn't aware of that, because when I just tried GraphHopper, it's now using the beach path (although it wasn't yesterday!) <br></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=-28.1073%2C153.4665%3B-28.1155%2C153.4709#map=16/-28.1115/153.4686">https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=-28.1073%2C153.4665%3B-28.1155%2C153.4709#map=16/-28.1115/153.4686</a></div><div><br></div><div>So ignore my previous comment, as it does work! :-)<br></div><div><br><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Thanks<div><br></div><div>Graeme</div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div>