<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-AU" link="blue" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Creating new Bus Stop nodes<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Is the consensus to remove the plaform tags from new nodes?
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> talk-au-request@openstreetmap.org <talk-au-request@openstreetmap.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, January 18, 2022 10:30:11 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> talk-au@openstreetmap.org <talk-au@openstreetmap.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Talk-au Digest, Vol 175, Issue 22</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to<br>
talk-au@openstreetmap.org<br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
talk-au-request@openstreetmap.org<br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
talk-au-owner@openstreetmap.org<br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: How to properly add address tags when multiple buildings<br>
share a housenumber? (Peter leGras)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 01:27:57 +1100<br>
From: Peter leGras <radiotrefoil@gmail.com><br>
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org<br>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] How to properly add address tags when multiple<br>
buildings share a housenumber?<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<CANtmSbn=2CkY4J-zT=cfnpy2BYqed9vF1MpSdzP-h5XLBPf2+A@mail.gmail.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Hi Peter,<br>
If you are tagging unit addresses in Orange NSW, I see a lot (but not all)<br>
of strata complexes actually have the address with unit number in the NSW<br>
spatial services addressing theme, despite not being displayed in the DCS<br>
NSW Base Map layer.<br>
This is a useful data source where there is restricted access, especially<br>
in strata.<br>
We have a waiver to use spatial services data such as this.<br>
<a href="https://portal.spatial.nsw.gov.au/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?useExisting=1&layers=d3cf7c7edef14ca18248c6dc5fcaff96">https://portal.spatial.nsw.gov.au/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?useExisting=1&layers=d3cf7c7edef14ca18248c6dc5fcaff96</a><br>
Hope you find it useful.<br>
I am mapping in the Blue Mountains and have done a bit of work in Orange. A<br>
few nearby mappers are active in the OSM World discord server that was<br>
mentioned recently in the talk-au list if you'd like to join us for casual<br>
discussion.<br>
Cheers<br>
other Peter (2hu4u)<br>
<br>
On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 at 23:20, Peter leGras <radiotrefoil@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi Peter,<br>
> The tag addr:housenumber does not render on non-building areas, but it is<br>
> still useful to include on the complex lot bounds to assist geocoding. You<br>
> can read more about this at<br>
> <a href="https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1746">https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1746</a><br>
> Note that adding a node tagged with addr:housenumber at the centre of the<br>
> complex will render on osm.org.<br>
> If there are multiple dwellings on the complex with the same housenumber,<br>
> you could add the addr:housenumber to every dwelling in the lot and<br>
> consider adding addr:unit or addr:flats to each as necessary.<br>
> Cheers<br>
> 2hu4u<br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220118/c0f59645/attachment-0001.htm">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220118/c0f59645/attachment-0001.htm</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-au mailing list<br>
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org<br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of Talk-au Digest, Vol 175, Issue 22<br>
****************************************<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>